Many blogs (including the much respected JustJared) and newspapers are posting the picture on the left saying that Victoria's legs are saggy.
Victoria is a size 0 and does not have an ouch of fat. So it surprises/shocks me that anyone can actually believe that the pictures is true. It was only this morning I was posting the picture on the right.
What do you think?
Source
13 comments:
Thanks for the clarification, I can't believe people actually think those pictures can be real. Victoria's body is far from being perfect and we all know it, but this is an absolutely laughable attempt to discredit her for no reason at all. People can be so sad.
Congrats for the blog anyway, I really enjoy reading it!
that its perthetic, and that this is actually news if somones freaking leg is out of proportion, serioulsy what is wrong with people, who actually bloody cares about somones leg. boring. thanx for putting it right Fashion C. how can people retouch this stuff and actually think its worth a flipping post on blogs?!!?!
je sais ce matin sur ton site j'ai vu les vrais photos et sur d'autre les fausses,je m'en suis tout de suite rendu compte,et je trouve sa misérable,quelque part c'est normal elle est trop bien,et les gens en sont jaloux ils ont peur alors ils cherchent par tous les moyens de lui trouver des tas de défaut,mais c'est vrai que d'aller jusqu'a faire trafiquer des photos,je trouve sa pathetique!!!et sinon je te félicite pour ton site qui est vraiment génial!!! it is pathetic and miserable to do that ,fortunately that your site is there
and i love your site!!!!
photoshop.deffinetley
ughh! dont get me started! ive lost some trust in Jared now! was verryyy disappointed
Those are the legs of a fat 60 year old, not a woman in her 30's of Victoria's careful eating and busy life.
Why the hell would she go to her photoshoot if her legs looked like that. Who the hell do these people think they are?
I also have "lost trust" with Just Jared, since he himself beleives they are real and to top it off he is leaving comments himself insisting they are not photoshopped, as if we fans are fools. I will not visit JJ again after how nasty he was with this post, I view him and his site in a totally different light now and that's not a good light. He is not a Posh/David fan as I thought he was, he was just posting the Beckhams news to try and get some hits, but I won't be returning there! Shame on him!
Thanks for the clarification. I thought it was odd that her legs looked so weird. It was kinda believable though because even skinny people have cellulite.
^^That's not even cellulite! That nasty saggy skin that blongs to an 80yr old woman. Do you think would go around wearing skirts and dresses like she does if her legs looked like that?!! No, she wouldn't.
I would love to know what she says about it.
When a fleshier part of the body is slammed down hard (i.e. a leg in a shoe, being slammed into the pavement with each step), the loose skin tend to bounce and ripple for a split second. The camera caught a stop-motion shot of Vicky stepping onto curb forcefully in that split second that her skin was rippling. An object in motion tends to stay in motion? It’s pretty straight forward. Just because she wouldn’t appear like that if standing in front of you or because it’ only appears that way in a few pictures does not mean it’s photoshopped.
I agree with everyone. We all know Victoria is a perfectionist so if she had legs like that she wouldn't even bother wearing a mini because she knows she's always photographed; whether she sees the paps or not...disappointment is an understatement of what i feel now towards justjared and i certainly won't be going there anymore as well...thanks fashion critic for the clarification
Unbelievable that someone waste´s their time adding sagginess and cellulite to the celebs. Didn´t even look believable way to much distortion and specially when it´s on just one of her leg´s ! Some one did this on Kate Hudson stomac and Kate moss knees a wile back.
otherwise grat site!
kisses www.margret.is
Post a Comment