Friday, 6 March 2009

Who Wore It Better? Victoria Beckham or Selita Ebanks


This comparison is almost impossible to call. They both look outstanding, so I will have to pick via the accessories.

I prefer Selita's strappy sandals to those YSL Trib Two's, so she wins for me.

at

7 comments:

  1. Elise6 March 2009 at 19:44

    I prefer Victoria's hair, the dress looks better when we see the shoulders.

    ReplyDelete
  2. snowwhite7 March 2009 at 00:03

    No matter how much I love Victoria, Selita win for me too...

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anonymous7 March 2009 at 01:06

    VB wins because of the hair. btw, NAP has 2 VB dresses left, one in a 6 and another in an 8.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Anonymous8 March 2009 at 07:18

    love your blog i found this random picture

    http://fast1.onesite.com/mipagina.univision.com/user/rodnerfigueroa/large/boston__nyfw_s08_044.jpg?v=389520

    ReplyDelete
  5. Anonymous8 March 2009 at 10:09

    hey fc, i thought you might find this article interesting..
    http://mamamia.com.au/weblog/2009/03/can-you-be-a-good-mother-while-wearing-15cm-heels-please-discuss.html
    i personally didnt agree with all of it cos i love vb, but i can see some of the points that these people are coming from, however i also believe that when we dont see all the photos of what happens when shes inside the theme park or inside her own home we should not judge her!

    ReplyDelete
  6. brit8 March 2009 at 13:22

    victoria, she just looks so so pretty in it, really beautiful.

    ReplyDelete
  7. DVB8 March 2009 at 15:32

    Hey Alannah,

    I read that in the Daily Mail. That is were the reader got it from.

    I disagree with it too. They are what I call limousine heels. She hardly walks around her home like that.

    ReplyDelete

ANONYMOUS COMMENTS WILL NOT BE POSTED

Please do not use the comment section to advertise websites.

Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.